Code validation using content assist

ABSTRACT

A process and associated system for code validation using content assist. A first list of items is presented to a code developer. Each item of the first list of items is enabled for validation and is a function or code method which generates a result upon being executed. An item selected by the developer from the first list of items is received. An input object associated with the selected item is identified. At least one input value for execution of the selected item is received from the developer. A result for the selected item is generated via execution of the selected item using the received at least one value as input for execution of the selected item. The result is displayed to the developer.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates generally to evaluating expressions in a dataprocessing system and more specifically to validation of an expressionin the data processing system.

BACKGROUND

Developers coding a program typically want to evaluate an expression ora function that is external to the program being coded and resides inanother program or a utility application-programming interface (API).Typically determining which method or version of a set of methods mayinclude guesswork.

For example, the developer uses a date time conversion utility createdby fellow programmers. In the application code, the developer is usingCurrentDate which is in a known ISO format in the following codestatement:

DateTimeUtil.convertISODateToDDMMMYY(CurrentDate);

The utility DateTimeUtil has a number of overloaded methods similar tothe example code statement including the following:

#1 public static string convertISODateToDDMMMYY(Date ISODate);

#2 public static string convertISODateToDDMMYY(String ISODate);

#3 public static int convertISODateToDDMMMYY(Date ISODate); and

#4 public static date convertISODateToDDMMMYY(Date ISODate);

Each of the example methods yields a different outcome depending on therequirement. The developer therefore has to traverse the documentationto determine which method suits a specific requirement, or review theDateTimeUtil code to identify the result generated per the requirement.

Using the technique referenced in the example to identify behavior ofthe method is typically error prone and non-productive.

BRIEF SUMMARY

The present invention provides a process and associated system for codevalidation using content assist. The process comprises:

presenting, to a code developer by one or more processors of a dataprocessing system, a first list of items, said first list of itemspresented to the developer who is writing software code during operationof a content assist in an integrated development environment (IDE) ofthe data processing system, said developer enabled by the content assistto write the software code faster during the operation of the contentassist than without the content assist, each item of the first list ofitems being enabled for validation, each item of the first list of itemsbeing a function or code method which generates a result upon beingexecuted by the one or more processors;

said one or more processors receiving, during the operation of thecontent assist, an item selected by the developer from the first list ofitems;

said one or more processors identifying, during the operation of thecontent assist, an input object associated with the selected item;

said one or more processors receiving from the developer, during theoperation of the content assist, at least one input value for executionof selected item;

said one or more processors generating, during the operation of thecontent assist, a result for the selected item by executing the selecteditem using the received at least one value as input for said executing;and

said one or more processors displaying, during the operation of thecontent assist, the result to the developer.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of this disclosure, reference is nowmade to the following brief description, taken in conjunction with theaccompanying drawings and detailed description, wherein like referencenumerals represent like parts.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary network data processing systemoperable for various embodiments of the disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary data processing systemoperable for various embodiments of the disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram representation of a content assist systemoperable for various embodiments of the disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a textual representation of a code snippet of a self-containedfunction in accordance with one embodiment of the disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a textual representation of entering a value for aself-contained function in accordance with one embodiment of thedisclosure.

FIG. 6 is a textual representation of a code snippet of a response for aself-contained function in accordance with one embodiment of thedisclosure.

FIG. 7 is a textual representation of a code snippet of a functionrequiring initialization in accordance with one embodiment of thedisclosure.

FIG. 8 is a textual representation of a code snippet of entering a valuefor a function requiring initialization in accordance with oneembodiment of the disclosure.

FIG. 9 is a textual representation of a code snippet of entering a valuefor a function requiring initialization in accordance with oneembodiment of the disclosure.

FIG. 10 is a textual representation of a code snippet of a response fora function requiring initialization in accordance with one embodiment ofthe disclosure.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a process for validating an expression usingthe content assist system of FIG. 3 in accordance with one embodiment ofthe disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Although an illustrative implementation of one or more embodiments isprovided below, the disclosed systems and/or methods may be implementedusing any number of techniques. This disclosure should in no way belimited to the illustrative implementations, drawings, and techniquesillustrated below, including the exemplary designs and implementationsillustrated and described herein, but may be modified within the scopeof the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.

For methods that yield a different outcome depending on the requirement,the present invention uses a technique of content assist which is afunction of some integrated development environments (IDE) which helpsthe developer write code typically faster and more efficiently thanwithout the content assist. The content assist may provide the developerwith a list of accessible keywords according to a programming languagespecification, variable, methods, or data types. The content assist maybe exemplified in the form of autocomplete, for example, whereinpredefined keywords are supplied or a specific structure such as atabular format applied, for a selected code element. In another example,the content assist may provide values from a database to populate thecontent assist itself and then a portion of the created code is insertedinto a file.

According to one embodiment, a computer-implemented process forvalidating an expression, presents a set of items, wherein each item inthe set of items having an expression option enabled for validation, toa requester, receives a selected item in the set of items from therequester, and determines whether initialization is needed for theselected item. Responsive to a determination that initialization is notneeded for the selected item, the process identifies an input objectassociated with the selected item, receives values for the identifiedinput object, and generates a result for the selected item using thereceived values for the identified input object in real time. Thecomputer-implemented process presents the result to the requester inreal time.

According to another embodiment, a computer program product forvalidating an expression comprises a computer recordable-type mediacontaining computer executable program code stored thereon. The computerexecutable program code comprises computer executable program code forpresenting a set of items, wherein each item in the set of items has anexpression option enabled for validation, to a requester, computerexecutable program code for receiving a selected item in the set ofitems having an expression option enabled for validation from therequester, computer executable program code for determining whetherinitialization is needed for the selected item, computer executableprogram code responsive to a determination that initialization is notneeded for the selected item, for identifying an input object associatedwith the selected item, computer executable program code for receivingvalues for the identified input object, computer executable program codefor generating a result for the selected item using the received valuesfor the identified input object in real time, and computer executableprogram code for presenting the result to the requester in real time.

According to another embodiment, an apparatus for validating anexpression, comprises a communications fabric, a memory connected to thecommunications fabric, wherein the memory contains computer executableprogram code, a communications unit connected to the communicationsfabric, an input/output unit connected to the communications fabric, adisplay connected to the communications fabric and a processor unitconnected to the communications fabric. The processor unit executes thecomputer executable program code to direct the apparatus to present aset of items, wherein each item in the set of items has an expressionoption enabled for validation, to a requester, receive a selected itemin the set of items having an expression option enabled for validationfrom the requester, determine whether initialization is needed for theselected item, responsive to a determination that initialization is notneeded for the selected item, identify an input object associated withthe selected item, receive values for the identified input object,generate a result for the selected item using the received values forthe identified input object in real time, and present the result to therequester in real time.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the presentdisclosure may be embodied as a system, method or computer programproduct. Accordingly, aspects of the present disclosure may take theform of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment(including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or anembodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may allgenerally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module,” or “system.”Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of acomputer program product embodied in one or more computer readablemedium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.

Any combination of one or more computer-readable medium(s) may beutilized. The computer-readable medium may be a computer-readablestorage medium (e.g., a hardware storage device) or a computer-readablesignal medium.

A computer-readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limitedto, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, orsemiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combinationof the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of thecomputer-readable storage medium would include the following: anelectrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computerdiskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory(ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flashmemory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory(CDROM), an optical storage device, or a magnetic storage device or anysuitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document,a computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that cancontain, or store a program for use by or in connection with aninstruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

A computer-readable signal medium may include a propagated data signalwith the computer-readable program code embodied therein, for example,either in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagatedsignal may take a variety of forms, including but not limited toelectro-magnetic, optical or any suitable combination thereof. Acomputer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium thatis not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate,propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with aninstruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

Program code embodied on a computer-readable medium may be transmittedusing any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless,wire line, optical fiber cable, radio frequency (RF), or any suitablecombination of the foregoing.

Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of thepresent disclosure may be written in any combination of one or moreprogramming languages, including an object oriented programming languagesuch as Java®, Smalltalk, C++, or the like and conventional proceduralprogramming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similarprogramming languages. Java and all Java-based trademarks and logos aretrademarks of Oracle, and/or its affiliates, in the United States, othercountries or both. The program code may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computeror entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide areanetwork (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer(for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).

Aspects of the present disclosure are described below with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus,(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer program instructions.

These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of ageneral purpose computer, special purpose computer, or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such thatthe instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer orother programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computerreadable medium that can direct a computer or other programmable dataprocessing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that theinstructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an articleof manufacture including instructions which implement the function/actspecified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer orother programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series ofoperational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmableapparatus to produce a computer-implemented process such that theinstructions which execute on the computer or other programmableapparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/actsspecified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

With reference now to the figures and in particular with reference toFIGS. 1-2, exemplary diagrams of data processing environments areprovided in which illustrative embodiments may be implemented. It shouldbe appreciated that FIGS. 1-2 are only exemplary and are not intended toassert or imply any limitation with regard to the environments in whichdifferent embodiments may be implemented. Many modifications to thedepicted environments may be made.

FIG. 1 depicts a pictorial representation of a network of dataprocessing systems in which illustrative embodiments may be implemented.Network data processing system 100 is a network of computers in whichthe illustrative embodiments may be implemented. Network data processingsystem 100 contains network 102, which is the medium used to providecommunications links between various devices and computers connectedtogether within network data processing system 100. Network 102 mayinclude connections, such as wire, wireless communication links, orfiber optic cables.

In the depicted example, server 104 and server 106 connect to network102 along with storage unit 108. In addition, clients 110, 112, and 114connect to network 102. Clients 110, 112, and 114 may be, for example,personal computers or network computers. In the depicted example, server104 provides data, such as boot files, operating system images, andapplications to clients 110, 112, and 114. Clients 110, 112, and 114 areclients to server 104 in this example. Network data processing system100 may include additional servers, clients, and other devices notshown.

In the depicted example, network data processing system 100 is theInternet with network 102 representing a worldwide collection ofnetworks and gateways that use the Transmission ControlProtocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) suite of protocols to communicatewith one another. At the heart of the Internet is a backbone ofhigh-speed data communication lines between major nodes or hostcomputers, consisting of thousands of commercial, governmental,educational and other computer systems that route data and messages. Ofcourse, network data processing system 100 also may be implemented as anumber of different types of networks, such as for example, an intranet,a local area network (LAN), or a wide area network (WAN). FIG. 1 isintended as an example, and not as an architectural limitation for thedifferent illustrative embodiments.

With reference to FIG. 2 a block diagram of an exemplary data processingsystem operable for various embodiments of the disclosure is presented.In this illustrative example, data processing system 200 includescommunications fabric 202, which provides communications betweenprocessor unit 204, memory 206, persistent storage 208, communicationsunit 210, input/output (I/O) unit 212, and display 214.

Processor unit 204 serves to execute instructions for software that maybe loaded into memory 206. Processor unit 204 may be a set of one ormore processors or may be a multi-processor core, depending on theparticular implementation. Further, processor unit 204 may beimplemented using one or more heterogeneous processor systems in which amain processor is present with secondary processors on a single chip. Asanother illustrative example, processor unit 204 may be a symmetricmulti-processor system containing multiple processors of the same type.Memory 206 and persistent storage 208 are examples of storage devices216. A storage device is any piece of hardware that is capable ofstoring information, such as, for example without limitation, data,program code in functional form, and/or other suitable informationeither on a temporary basis and/or a permanent basis. Memory 206, inthese examples, may be, for example, a random access memory or any othersuitable volatile or non-volatile storage device. Persistent storage 208may take various forms depending on the particular implementation. Forexample, persistent storage 208 may contain one or more components ordevices. For example, persistent storage 208 may be a hard drive, aflash memory, a rewritable optical disk, a rewritable magnetic tape, orsome combination of the above. The media used by persistent storage 208also may be removable. For example, a removable hard drive may be usedfor persistent storage 208. Thus, the data processing system maycomprise one or more processors, a memory coupled to the processor, anda computer readable storage device coupled to the processor, wherein thestorage device contains program code, which upon being executed by theone or more processors via the memory, implements the methods of thepresent invention.

Communications unit 210, in these examples, provides for communicationswith other data processing systems or devices. In these examples,communications unit 210 is a network interface card. Communications unit210 may provide communications through the use of either or bothphysical and wireless communications links.

Input/output unit 212 allows for input and output of data with otherdevices that may be connected to data processing system 200. Forexample, input/output unit 212 may provide a connection for user inputthrough a keyboard, a mouse, and/or some other suitable input device.Further, input/output unit 212 may send output to a printer. Display 214provides a mechanism to display information to a user.

Instructions for the operating system, applications and/or programs maybe located in storage devices 216, which are in communication withprocessor unit 204 through communications fabric 202. In theseillustrative examples the instructions are in a functional form onpersistent storage 208. These instructions may be loaded into memory 206for execution by processor unit 204. The processes of the differentembodiments may be performed by processor unit 204 usingcomputer-implemented instructions, which may be located in a memory,such as memory 206.

These instructions are referred to as program code, computer usableprogram code, or computer readable program code that may be read andexecuted by a processor in processor unit 204. The program code in thedifferent embodiments may be embodied on different physical or tangiblecomputer readable storage media, such as memory 206 or persistentstorage 208. Program code 218 is located in a functional form oncomputer readable storage media 220 that is selectively removable andmay be loaded onto or transferred to data processing system 200 forexecution by processor unit 204. Program code 218 and computer readablestorage media 220 form computer program product 222 in these examples.In one example, computer readable storage media 220 may be in a tangibleform, such as, for example, an optical or magnetic disc that is insertedor placed into a drive or other device that is part of persistentstorage 208 for transfer onto a storage device, such as a hard drivethat is part of persistent storage 208. In a tangible form, computerreadable storage media 220 also may take the form of a persistentstorage, such as a hard drive, a thumb drive, or a flash memory that isconnected to data processing system 200. The tangible form of computerreadable storage media 220 is also referred to as computer recordablestorage media. In some instances, computer readable storage media 220may not be removable.

Alternatively, program code 218 may be transferred to data processingsystem 200 from computer readable storage media 220 through acommunications link to communications unit 210 and/or through aconnection to input/output unit 212. The communications link and/or theconnection may be physical or wireless in the illustrative examples Thecomputer program product may comprise a computer readable tangiblestorage medium (e.g., hardware storage device) having computer readableprogram code stored therein. The program code, upon being executed byone or more processors of a computer system, implements the methods ofthe present invention.

In some illustrative embodiments, program code 218 may be downloadedover a network to persistent storage 208 from another device or dataprocessing system for use within data processing system 200. Forinstance, program code stored in a computer readable storage medium in aserver data processing system may be downloaded over a network from theserver to data processing system 200. The data processing systemproviding program code 218 may be a server computer, a client computer,or some other device capable of storing and transmitting program code218.

Typically expediting the development process, reducing or eliminatingerrors and improving productivity, is achieved when using embodiments ofthe disclosed process. An embodiment of the disclosed process provides acapability in the form of an enhanced content assist feature in theintegrated development environment (IDE) to enable validation of anexpression and to return responses of functions/methods during contentassist or during the completion of content assist thus enabling thedeveloper to select a correct method/function according to use.

In one embodiment, the content/code assist feature of the presentinvention presents to the code developer: (a) internal functions/methodsin the current code/software that the code developer is developing; and(b) external functions/methods in other external programs orapplication-programming interfaces (APIs) being referenced or used inthe current code/software being developed. Both the internal andexternal functions/methods may be displayed or otherwise presented tothe code developer in a list of items. Each item of the list of itemsmay be enabled for validation.

Using an embodiment of the disclosed process with the previous examplethe developer is prompted to indicate whether to validate thefunction/method as one of the options of content assist. Alternatively,the need to indicate could be added as a context menu to a section ofcode selected. When the developer chooses to validate, a set of editablefields are appended to a content assist dialog in which the developer isable specify input data, and responses from the validation are shown asa separate dialog/call out or in a different view. Additionally, asuggestion feature, which stores results of a function/method evaluatedon starting of the IDE or stored in a historical memory, allows thedeveloper to choose from an alternate of the function/method based onperformance criteria, including memory footprint, and execution time.Based on the responses received, the developer chooses to proceed with afunction/method suiting the requirement. An illustrative embodiment thusprovides an option added in a content assist to validate a portion ofcode at programming time. The illustrative embodiment further includesan introspected object, using a user interface (UI), enables developersto add literal values as input to the code validation. Results aredisplayed using the UI instantly at the time of validation. The displayof results typically includes information comprising expected executiontime and memory footprint used by the validated function. Optionally thedisplay of information further comprises a suggestion of an alternativefunction that produces the same results while delivering betterperformance or is preferred according to other associated criteria.

Using data processing system 200 of FIG. 2 as an example, acomputer-implemented process for code validation using content assist ispresented. Processor unit 204 presents a set of items, for example, inan integrated development environment, from storage devices 216, usingdisplay 214, wherein each item in the set of items having an expressionoption enabled for validation, to a requester, and receives a selecteditem in the set of items having an expression option enabled forvalidation from the requester using communications unit 210,input/output unit 212 or display 214. Processor unit 204 furtherdetermines whether initialization is needed for the selected item andresponsive to a determination that initialization is not needed for theselected item, identifies an input object associated with the selecteditem, and receives values for the identified input object. Processorunit 204 generates a result for the selected item using the receivedvalues for the identified input object in real time and presents theresult to the requester in real time using display 214.

With reference to FIG. 3 a block diagram of a content assist systemoperable for various embodiments of the disclosure is presented. Contentassist system 300 is an example of enhanced content assist comprising anumber of components including expression option 302, input injector304, content assist processor 306, user interface 308, preferences 310and history 312. Throughout the disclosure the terms function and methodmay be used interchangeably.

Content assist system 300 leverages typical support services of anunderlying data processing system such as network data processing system100 of FIG. 1 or data processing system 200 of FIG. 2. The components,in the example, of content assist system 300 of FIG. 3 may either beimplemented as a set of logically separate components, a set ofphysically separate components or a combination thereof withoutaffecting the function of the defined functions. In the exampleembodiment of the disclosure, content assist system 300 is a collectionof capabilities embedded in an integrated development environmentforming a combination representing an enhanced integrated developmentenvironment. In an alternate embodiment of the disclosure, contentassist system 300 may be implemented as a set of capabilities leveragingsupport of an underlying data processing system with programmatic accessto components such as a run-time (rather than the previously providedexample using the integrated development environment) to deliver thedescribed set of capabilities without a loss of capabilities.

Expression option 302 provides a capability of enabling content assistto validate a portion of code at programming time. Expression option 302may be implemented through provision of a prompt indicating whether avalidate operation associated with a function/method is available as anoption of content assist. Rather than a prompt, another embodimentenables the need to indicate in the form of a context menu associatedwith a section of code selected; for example, selecting a date comparefunction in which a version of the function includes a validaterequirement from a set of statements in user interface 308 includingregular functions and corresponding validate versions of the functions.

Input injector 304 provides a capability of an introspected objectenabling a developer to add literal values as input to a selectedfunction for code validation. Input injector 304 provides a capabilityto dynamically obtain values, externally, for parameters of the selectedfunction being validated. For example, a prompt associated with theintrospected object requests values for parameters requiring inputinformation before processing of the validation operation by contentassist processor 306. The required values may be provided by a developeror in another embodiment by a response file or database lookup. In oneembodiment, preferences 310 provides properties or attributes used tocontrol the behavior of processing, such as providing default values forfunctions which cannot provide the values or to enable the functions tobe evaluated without the developer input.

Content assist processor 306 provides a capability of executing aselected function using appropriate input values in real time. Theresults provided from the processing are available at the time ofvalidation. Processing, when required, includes initialization of anynon-initialized variables requiring initialization to perform asubsequent evaluation of the selected function.

User interface 308 provides a capability of visual interaction with auser enabling the user to input required values for a selected functionand to display results generated by content assist processor 306. Userinterface 308 displays results in real time as a separate dialog orcallout or a different view from that of the view used to obtain input.The display of results may optionally include alternative functions forthe selected function. The alternative functions typically provide thesame results as the selected function but deliver improvement accordingto specific criteria (the criteria may be provided using preferences 310or in a dialog with the user).

Preferences 310 provide a capability to control behavior of processingin content assist system 300. Preferences 310 enable establishment ofcustomizable properties including default values for supported functionsfor which validation is desired, and storage locations for temporary andpersistent data (such as history of function specific field values). Forexample, a preference provides a default base date value for injectioninto a date related function. In another example, a preference indicatesa report output providing a list of the top three alternatives accordingto execution time or memory usage.

Using preferences 310 provide a mechanism for programmatic operation ofcontent assist system 300 without developer interaction to performprogrammatic injection of values into a respective function underevaluation. Preferences 310 provide a capability to address injection onmultiple levels of user interface and data files. For example, in anembodiment of content assist system 300, operation is performed in thebackground for a predetermined group of functions to generate resultsfor each respective function wherein the results are summarized as alist of alternate functions, from which a preferred candidate isselected using a predetermined selection criteria and presented to arequester. In an embodiment using the report output providing a list ofalternatives, a dialog presents the list of alternatives generated inthe background, to the developer according to a ranking using theexecution time or memory usage. In this manner scripts may be used toevaluate and validate several similar functions.

History 312 provides a capability to store values associated with afunction or the same value used across functions. The stored valuescomprise values including input values (for example, preferences) aswell as output values. When used for storing output values, storageenables retrieval and calculation operations upon the saved valuesincluding ranking and sorting as may be used when compiling a rankedlist of alternatives. History 312 is accordingly a data structurecreated and managed by content assist system 300.

With reference to FIG. 4 a textual representation of a code snippet of aself-contained function in accordance with one embodiment of thedisclosure is presented. Code snippet 400 is an example of using contentassist system 300 of FIG. 3 in one embodiment. The self-containedfunction of the example requires no external initialization.

Code snippet 400 provides an example of using a date and time utilitywhich is portrayed in a dialog 402 exposing a set of methods 404. Eachmethod in set of methods 404 is a regular method, which was implementedprior to enhanced content assist of content assist system 300. A set ofenhanced methods 406 provides versions of corresponding methods of setof methods 404 which have been enhanced to include support for avalidate operation in the form of context menu 408. A user selects amethod for validation using the context menu.

With reference to FIG. 5 a textual representation of entering a valuefor a self-contained function in accordance with one embodiment of thedisclosure is presented. Code snippet 500 is a continuation of theexample of code snippet 400 of FIG. 4.

Code snippet 500 contains the information previously described in theexplanation of code snippet 400 with the addition of a dialog. Popup 502provides a capability for the user to input required field values forthe selected function being validated. On selection of the method withvalidate option the developer is enabled to enter a value of the dateobject on the same dialog or a separate dialog. The input object, thatis the date object, is identified through introspection, for example,Java reflection. The input values entered are used to validate thefunction and to yield a response instantly at programming time, as inreal time. The dialog and values associated with the method vary withthe needs of the function and method being validated. The values may beprovided dynamically by the user of the dialog or using data containedin preferences 310 of FIG. 3.

With reference to FIG. 6 a textual representation of a response for aself-contained function in accordance with one embodiment of thedisclosure is presented. Code snippet 600 is a continuation of theexample of code snippet 400 of FIG. 4. However code snippet 600 portraysresult 602 for the selected method generated by content assist processor306 of content assist system 300 of FIG. 3.

Code snippet 600 contains information previously described in theexplanation of code snippet 400 and code snippet 500 with the additionof information comprising result 602. In the example, result 602provides information in the form of the previous dialog of popup 502.Result 602 provides the actual result of executing the selected method.

However result 602 may also provide additional information comprisingperformance information 604 associated with the execution of theselected method. The performance information available is dependent uponthe selected function and environment but typically includes values ofexpected execution time and memory footprint (i.e., memory usage).Optionally result 602 provides alternate method 606 providing the sameresult for the selected method subject to predetermined criteria. In analternate embodiment, result 602 provides a list of methods in alternatemethod 606. The criteria for the list are determined using therespective function being validated and preferences 310 of FIG. 3.

Reporting of results accordingly varies as determined by the performancecriteria for a respective function and interest of the user as well asexistence of alternate functions having a same (or similar) capabilityand meeting predetermined performance criteria. For example, when memoryusage is a key criterion, a ranking of alternate functions is presentedaccording to the memory usage. The number of list elements may also becontrolled by availability of alternate functions and limitationprovided by the user. Typically when no alternate functions areavailable (or none meet the predetermined criteria) an entry of NIL isdisplayed.

In the example, result 602 is displayed using the same dialog as theprevious dialog of popup 502. The result may re-use a previous dialog ormay be displayed using another dialog or window as desired dependingupon an indication in the preferences specified.

With reference to FIG. 7, a textual representation of a code snippet ofa function requiring initialization in accordance with one embodiment ofthe disclosure is presented. Code snippet 700 is an example of usingcontent assist system 300 of FIG. 3 in one embodiment. The function ofthe example requires initialization of global variables of anapplication-programming interface to execute the selected function underevaluation.

Code snippet 700 is an extension of the example of using a date and timeutility portrayed in a dialog 402 exposing a set of methods 404. Eachmethod in set of methods 404 is a regular method, which was implementedprior to enhanced content assist of content assist system 300. A set ofenhanced methods 702 provides versions of corresponding methods of setof methods 404 which have been enhanced to include support for avalidate operation in the form of context menu 704. A user selects amethod for validation, such as a compareTo method, using the contextmenu.

The compareTo method requires comparing an input value to the value of alocal variable (for example, Current date variable) for the method to beinitialized. Accordingly validating using the enhanced content assist ofcontent assist system 300 requires another step to be performed (incontrast with the previous example of FIG. 4) before a final expressionis validated.

With reference to FIG. 8 a textual representation of entering a valuefor a function requiring initialization in accordance with oneembodiment of the disclosure is presented. Code snippet 800 is acontinuation of the example of code snippet 700 of FIG. 7.

Code snippet 800 contains the information previously described in theexplanation of code snippet 700 with the addition of a dialog. Popup 502provides a capability for the user to input required field values forthe method of selected context 802 being validated. On selection of themethod with validate option the developer is enabled to enter a value ofthe date object on the same dialog or a separate dialog. The inputobject, that is the date object, is identified through introspection,for example, Java reflection. The input values entered are used tovalidate the method and to yield a response instantly at programmingtime, as in real time. The dialog and values associated with the methodvary with the needs of the function and method being validated.

Prompt 804 is presented to the user to solicit input field values forthe method being validated. Prompt 804 may use the same dialog as popup502 or a separate dialog depending upon an indication in the preferencesspecified. A prompt may solicit a value or a change to a default valueprovided. In an embodiment, a default value suffices enabling thefunction to be invoked in the background and thus provide a result inthe dialog.

With reference to FIG. 9 a textual representation of entering a valuefor a function requiring initialization in accordance with oneembodiment of the disclosure is presented. Code snippet 900 is acontinuation of the example of code snippet 900 of FIG. 8, however codesnippet 900 is used once initialization of global variables of anapplication-programming interface used to execute the selected functionunder evaluation is complete. Final input variable values are requestedin a similar fashion.

In this case, the input object, that is the date object, is identifiedthrough introspection, for example, Java reflection. Input values 902entered are used to validate the function and to generate a response inreal time.

With reference to FIG. 10 a textual representation of a response for afunction requiring initialization in accordance with one embodiment ofthe disclosure is presented. Code snippet 1000 is a continuation of theexample of code snippet 900 of FIG. 9, however code snippet 1000portrays result 1002 for the selected method generated by content assistprocessor 306 of content assist system 300 of FIG. 3.

Code snippet 1000 contains information previously described in theexplanation of code snippet 700, code snippet 800 and code snippet 900with the addition of information comprising result 1002. In the example,result 1002 provides information in the form of the previous dialog ofpopup 502. Result 1002 may simply provide the actual result of executingthe selected method. However result 1002 may also provide additionalinformation comprising performance information 1004 associated with theexecution of the selected method. The performance information availableis dependent upon the selected function and environment but typicallyincludes values of expected execution time and memory usage. Optionallyresult 1002 provides alternate method 1006 providing the same result forthe selected method subject to predetermined criteria.

In the example, result 1002 is displayed using the same dialog as theprevious dialog of popup 502. The result may re-use a previous dialog ormay be displayed using another dialog or window as desired. Reporting ofresults, as previously stated, accordingly varies as determined by theperformance criteria for a respective function and interest of the user.

With reference to FIG. 11 a flowchart of a process for code validationusing content assist in accordance with one embodiment of the disclosureis presented. Process 1100 is an example of a code validation processusing content assist system 300 of FIG. 3 in an integrated developmentenvironment (IDE) of a computer system depicted in FIG. 1 and/or FIG. 2.The code assist is in operation throughout the performance of theprocess of FIG. 11.

Process 1100 begins (step 1102) and presents a set of items having anexpression option enabled for validation to a requester (step 1104). Therequester may be a code developer who is writing software code duringoperation of the content assist in the integrated developmentenvironment (IDE) of the computer system. The developer is enabled bythe content assist to write the software code faster during theoperation of the content assist than without the content assist. Eachitem may be a function or code method which generates a result uponbeing executed by one or more processors of the computer system. In oneembodiment, the items may be methods that include support for a validateoperation such as the enhanced methods 406 depicted in FIG. 4. Process1100 receives, a selected item in the set of items having an expressionoption enabled for validation, from the requester (step 1106). An itemin the set of items having an expression option enabled for validationhas a corresponding item in a set of regular methods (not enabled forvalidation). The expression option, when selected, provides a capabilityto validate input values used in the expression, which is a method orfunction, by executing the method or function in step 1114 andpresenting (e.g., displaying) the result of executing the method orfunction in step 1116.

The content assist afforded the selected item is based on the existingcode structure of the item and does not add assistance from an externalsource such as a file or database. The content assist provides more thancode completion, by providing a capability to test the selected item attime of selection rather than later when a program using the selecteditem is executed.

Process 1100 determines whether initialization is needed for theselected item (step 1108). Initialization refers to a need to performinitialization of global variables of an application-programminginterface to execute the function of the selected item under evaluation.When a determination is made that initialization is not needed, process1100 identifies an input object associated with the selected item (step1110). A standalone function is an example in which initialization ofglobal variables is not needed. In one example of identifying an inputobject the identification is made through introspection, for example,Java reflection.

When a determination is made that initialization is needed, process 1100prompts the requester for values for predetermined non-initializedvariables requiring initialization (step 1118). Process 1100 receivesthe values from the requester for the predetermined non-initializedvariables requiring initialization (step 1120). The values received maybe initial values from the requester or may be replacement valuesprovided in place of previously supplied default values. Process 1100performs the required initialization (step 1122) and returns to performstep 1110 as before (i.e., identifying the input object associated withthe selected item).

Process 1100 receives values for the identified input object (step1112). The values received may be initial values from the requester ormay be replacement values provided in place of previously supplieddefault values, which may be at least one input value for execution ofselected item.

Process 1100 generates a result of executing the selected item (i.e.,selected method or function) by executing the selected item using thevalues of the identified input object in real time (step 1114).

Process 1100 presents the result (e.g., by displaying the result) ofexecution of the selected item to the requester in real time (step 1116)and terminates thereafter (step 1124). Presentation of the results usinga user interface may comprise use of the same dialog used to obtaininput values, a different dialog or view as needed.

Thus is presented, in an illustrative embodiment, a computer-implementedprocess for validating an expression which presents a set of items, inan integrated development environment wherein each item in the set ofitems having an expression option enabled for validation, to arequester, and receives a selected item in the set of items having anexpression option enabled for validation from the requester. Thecomputer-implemented process further determines whether initializationis needed for the selected item and responsive to a determination thatinitialization is not needed for the selected item, identifies an inputobject associated with the selected item, receives values for theidentified input object, generates a result for the selected item usingthe received values for the identified input object in real time andpresents the result to the requester in real time.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof code, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing a specified logical function. It should also be noted that,in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the blockmight occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, twoblocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantiallyconcurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverseorder, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be notedthat each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, andcombinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchartillustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-basedsystems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations ofspecial purpose hardware and computer instructions.

The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of allmeans or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended toinclude any structure, material, or act for performing the function incombination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. Thedescription of the present invention has been presented for purposes ofillustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive orlimited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications andvariations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the artwithout departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Theembodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain theprinciples of the invention and the practical application, and to enableothers of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention forvarious embodiments with various modifications as are suited to theparticular use contemplated.

The invention can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, anentirely software embodiment or an embodiment containing both hardwareand software elements. In a preferred embodiment, the invention isimplemented in software, which includes but is not limited to firmware,resident software, microcode, and other software media that may berecognized by one skilled in the art.

It is important to note that while the present invention has beendescribed in the context of a fully functioning data processing system,those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the processes ofthe present invention are capable of being distributed in the form of acomputer readable medium of instructions and a variety of forms and thatthe present invention applies equally regardless of the particular typeof signal bearing media actually used to carry out the distribution.Examples of computer readable media include recordable-type media, suchas a floppy disk, a hard disk drive, a RAM, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, andtransmission-type media, such as digital and analog communicationslinks, wired or wireless communications links using transmission forms,such as, for example, radio frequency and light wave transmissions. Thecomputer readable media may take the form of coded formats that aredecoded for actual use in a particular data processing system.

A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing programcode will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectlyto memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can includelocal memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulkstorage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at leastsome program code in order to reduce the number of times code must beretrieved from bulk storage during execution.

Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards,displays, pointing devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system eitherdirectly or through intervening I/O controllers. Network adapters mayalso be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system tobecome coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers orstorage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems,cable modems, and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currentlyavailable types of network adapters.

While particular embodiments of the present invention have beendescribed herein for purposes of illustration, many modifications andchanges will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly,the appended claims are intended to encompass all such modifications andchanges as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A process for code validation using contentassist, said process comprising: presenting, by one or more processorsof a data processing system, a first list of items to a code developerwho is writing software code during operation of a content assist in anintegrated development environment (IDE) of the data processing system,said developer enabled by the content assist to write the software codefaster during the operation of the content assist than without thecontent assist, each item of the first list of items being enabled forvalidation, each item of the first list of items being a function orcode method which generates a result upon being executed by the one ormore processors; said one or more processors receiving, during theoperation of the content assist, an item selected by the developer fromthe first list of items; said one or more processors identifying, duringthe operation of the content assist, an input object associated with theselected item; said one or more processors receiving from the developer,during the operation of the content assist, at least one input value forexecution of selected item; said one or more processors generating,during the operation of the content assist, a result for the selecteditem by (i) executing the selected item using the received at least onevalue as input for said executing and (ii) ascertaining whether saidexecuting the selected item requires prior initialization of a value ofa variable; and said one or more processors displaying, during theoperation of the content assist, the result to the developer.
 2. Theprocess of claim 1, wherein said identifying the input object isperformed using introspection.
 3. The process of claim 1, wherein saidpresenting further comprises presenting, to the code developer by theone or more processors, a second list of items simultaneously with thefirst set of items, and wherein each item of the second list of itemscorresponds to a respective item of the first list of items and differsfrom the respective item only by not being enabled for validation. 4.The process of claim 1, wherein said displaying further comprisesdisplaying at least one performance characteristic, and wherein the atleast one performance characteristic comprises an expected executiontime for execution of the selected item, a memory usage needed by theselected item, or a combination thereof.
 5. The process of claim 1,wherein said displaying further comprises displaying a list of alternateitems ranked according to a performance characteristic, and wherein theperformance characteristic is an expected execution time for thealternate items or a memory usage needed by the alternate items.
 6. Theprocess of claim 1, wherein said ascertaining comprises ascertainingthat said executing the selected item does not require priorinitialization of a value of a variable.
 7. The process of claim 1,wherein said ascertaining comprises ascertaining that said executing theselected item requires prior initialization of a value of a variable,and wherein the method further comprises: after said ascertaining thatsaid executing the selected item requires said prior initialization,said one or more processors receiving the value of the variable; andsaid one or more processors initializing the variable with the receivedvalue of the variable.
 8. The process of claim 7, wherein the variableis a global variable of an application-programming interface used toexecute the selected item.
 9. The process of claim 7, wherein saidreceiving the value of the variable comprises receiving the value of thevariable from the developer.
 10. The process of claim 7, wherein saidinitializing comprises: receiving, from the developer, a validationmethod and an inputted value; and comparing the inputted value to avalue of a local variable using the validation method.
 11. A computerprogram product, comprising a computer readable storage device havingcomputer readable program code stored therein, said program, upon beingexecuted by one or more processors of a data processing system,implements a process for code validation using content assist, saidprocess comprising: presenting, by the one or more processors, a firstlist of items to a code developer who is writing software code duringoperation of a content assist in an integrated development environment(IDE) of the data processing system, said developer enabled by thecontent assist to write the software code faster during the operation ofthe content assist than without the content assist, each item of thefirst list of items being enabled for validation, each item of the firstlist of items being a function or code method which generates a resultupon being executed by the one or more processors; said one or moreprocessors receiving, during the operation of the content assist, anitem selected by the developer from the first list of items; said one ormore processors identifying, during the operation of the content assist,an input object associated with the selected item; said one or moreprocessors receiving from the developer, during the operation of thecontent assist, at least one input value for execution of selected item;said one or more processors generating, during the operation of thecontent assist, a result for the selected item by (i) executing theselected item using the received at least one value as input for saidexecuting and (ii) ascertaining whether said executing the selected itemrequired prior initialization of a value of a variable; and said one ormore processors displaying, during the operation of the content assist,the result to the developer.
 12. The computer program product of claim11, wherein said identifying the input object is performed usingintrospection.
 13. The computer program product of claim 11, whereinsaid presenting further comprises presenting, to the code developer bythe one or more processors, a second list of items simultaneously withthe first set of items, and wherein each item of the second list ofitems corresponds to a respective item of the first list of items anddiffers from the respective item only by not being enabled forvalidation.
 14. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein saiddisplaying further comprises displaying at least one performancecharacteristic, and wherein the at least one performance characteristiccomprises an expected execution time for execution of the selected item,a memory usage needed by the selected item, or a combination thereof.15. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein said displayingfurther comprises displaying a list of alternate items ranked accordingto a performance characteristic, and wherein the performancecharacteristic is an expected execution time for the alternate items ora memory usage needed by the alternate items.
 16. A data processingsystem comprising one or more processors, a memory, and a computerreadable storage device, said storage device containing program codewhich, upon being executed by the one or more processors via the memory,implements a process for code validation using content assist, saidprocess comprising: presenting, by the one or more processors, a firstlist of items to a code developer who is writing software code duringoperation of a content assist in an integrated development environment(IDE) of the data processing system, said developer enabled by thecontent assist to write the software code faster during the operation ofthe content assist than without the content assist, each item of thefirst list of items being enabled for validation, each item of the firstlist of items being a function or code method which generates a resultupon being executed by the one or more processors; said one or moreprocessors receiving, during the operation of the content assist, anitem selected by the developer from the first list of items; said one ormore processors identifying, during the operation of the content assist,an input object associated with the selected item; said one or moreprocessors receiving from the developer, during the operation of thecontent assist, at least one input value for execution of selected item;said one or more processors generating, during the operation of thecontent assist, a result for the selected item by (i) executing theselected item using the received at least one value as input for saidexecuting and (ii) ascertaining whether said executing the selected itemrequires prior initialization of a value of a variable; and said one ormore processors displaying, during the operation of the content assist,the result to the developer.
 17. The data processing system of claim 16,wherein said identifying the input object is performed usingintrospection.
 18. The data processing system of claim 16, wherein saidpresenting further comprises presenting, to the code developer by theone or more processors, a second list of items simultaneously with thefirst set of items, and wherein each item of the second list of itemscorresponds to a respective item of the first list of items and differsfrom the respective item only by not being enabled for validation. 19.The data processing system of claim 16, wherein said displaying furthercomprises displaying at least one performance characteristic, andwherein the at least one performance characteristic comprises anexpected execution time for execution of the selected item, a memoryusage needed by the selected item, or a combination thereof.
 20. Thedata processing system of claim 16, wherein said displaying furthercomprises displaying a list of alternate items ranked according to aperformance characteristic, and wherein the performance characteristicis an expected execution time for the alternate items or a memory usageneeded by the alternate items.